MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385381625 · doi:10.1002/admt.202300717

Carbon‐Based Electrochemical‐Free Chlorine Sensors

2023· article· en· W4385381625 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials Technologies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChlorineSodium hypochloriteInertElectrochemistryCarbon fibersHypochloriteMaterials scienceNanotechnologyEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industryEnvironmental chemistryWaste managementChemistryInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryEngineeringMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sodium hypochlorite is a widely used additive in water used to disinfect and remove any disease‐causing bacteria that can be found in sources of water, and is used to wash contaminants from meats, fruits, and vegetables. Many free chlorine sensors exist which monitor free chlorine levels such as the use of colorimetric or electrochemical methods, ensuring that the free chlorine is within safe and regulated levels. However colorimetric sensing methods are irreversible and often use toxic compounds, and electrochemical sensors, although reversible, are made with materials which are not suitable to be used near drinking water or food products. By developing sensors which are made using alternative materials and methods, the sensors can be used in and around drinking water and food products. This review article discusses various electrochemical‐free chlorine sensors made with various carbon‐based materials and methods resulting in sensors that are biodegradable, relatively inert, and resilient in the presence of harsh chemicals, making them safe to use near and around food and still maintain competitive performance parameters. This review article showcases some of the recent progress, the importance, preconditions, and the various future needs and potentials of carbon‐based electrochemical‐free chlorine sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it