MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385386594 · doi:10.18280/ria.370317

Natya Shastra: Deep Learning for Automatic Classification of Hand Mudra in Indian Classical Dance Videos

2023· article· en· W4385386594 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pallavi Malavath, Nagaraju Devarakonda

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceDeep learningVisual artsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human body's temporal fluctuation is referred to as human activity.The preservation of cultural heritage, the development of video recommendation systems, the support of learners via tutoring systems will benefit from the capture and evaluation of dance-related multimedia content.Because of its detailed hand gesture, Indian classical dance (ICD) classification is still an enthralling field of study.This provides a framework for analyzing various computer vision and deep learning ideas.Automated teaching solutions across all disciplines, from traditional to online forums, become unavoidable through changes in learning habits.ICD also becomes a crucial component of a thriving culture and heritage that must be updated and preserved at all costs.The dance involves complex positions like self-hands-occlusion and full-body rotation.The main objective of this study is, in the Bharatanatyam dancing style we proposed a framework for categorizing hasta mudras.Our Convolution Neural Network -Long Short Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) deep knowledge architecture for Indian Classical Dancing (ICD) categorization now includes a new hand posture signature.By guessing where people's hands would be, we rated dance performances.This architecture assesses hand poses using information and information pruning, while a dance instructor application assesses the time and accuracy of student dances.252 YouTube videos of the Bharatanatyam dance form has been used to make up the dataset used in our research.This study offers a methodology with three-phase deep learning techniques.Then, using the pre-trained paradigm TensorFlow EfficientNet -UNet, which aids us in determining any hand position within the frame, we extracted the appropriate joint locations of the hands from each video frame.Then, cosine similarity was used to identify or correlate the indicated action factors.Finally, using key details from the hand pose, we categorized it and trained the Convolution Neural Network -Long Short Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) network structure using the classification system's training dataset.Regarding factors like accuracy, F1-score, AUC curve, recall and precision, the proposed CNN-LSTM structure for classifying hand mudras is compared with Convolutional LSTM Long Term Recurrent Convolutional Network(LRCN), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), LSTM and 3D Convolutional Layer (CONV3D).As a result, it was found that throughout the examination process, the proposed CNN-LSTM classification structure achieved 98.53% accuracy, 99.04% precision, 98.49% recall, 99.12% AUC score, and 98.74% F1-score.This achieves 94.03% accuracy, 93.13% precision, 94.76% recall, 96.06% AUC score, and 93.53% F1-score during the training method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicDiversity and Impact of DanceFrench-language works237,207