MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385386979 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.130307

A Resilience Approach to Improving Safety Performance in Construction

2023· article· en· W4385386979 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rossy Armyn Machfudiyanto

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResilience (materials science)Risk analysis (engineering)Computer scienceEngineeringTransport engineeringBusinessMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The construction industry is recognized as having inherent risks with high levels of change and uncertainty.The complexity of this project poses a challenge to traditional safety management approaches.As an alternative, a resilience approach to traditional safety management is used, which is designed to deal with uncertainty in a high-risk work environment in the form of a resilience safety culture.This research will look at the relationship between resilience safety culture variables, and safety performance in a stateowned construction company in Indonesia using the partial least squares structural equation modeling approach.Resilience safety culture variables in this study include management commitment, reporting, learning, anticipation, flexibility, awareness, coworker's safety perception, supervisor's safety perception, safety attitudes, understanding of risk, safety resources, and safety procedures.The results of the PLS-SEM test show that there are 9 relationships between variables that have a significant positive influence.As a significant variable that has a direct effect on safety performance, awareness is the main determining factor for improving the company's safety performance.With the significant influence of safety awareness on safety performance, there is a need to increase safety awareness to ensure consistent improvement in safety performance.It is recommended for companies to be able to increase safety awareness, one of which is through safety awareness workshops as a way to improve safety performance.The provision of this workshop is an initiative to increase the ability to anticipate and manage risk proactively which can result in an increased level of awareness of hazards and provide a deeper understanding of safety at work sites so that appropriate preventive measures can be taken to reduce the possibility of accidents or unwanted incidents.These results are expected to be used as a guideline for companies in increasing their safety performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207