A Model for Implementing Digital Personnel Management in Security and Safety for Engineering Enterprises
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main purpose of the article is to study the key aspects of digital personnel management of socio-economic systems in terms of security and safety.The object of the study will be enterprises providing engineering services to ensure safety and security.According to the results of the study, the main scientific and theoretical novelty was the formation of a model for the implementation of digital personnel management in terms of ensuring security and safety for an enterprise providing engineering services.The study has limitations and they consist in considering only enterprises providing engineering services, which are a specific type of activity.Further research should be devoted to the study of personnel security against the background of the formation of new principles of digital human resource management.The focus of the study is to focus on the features of digital personnel management and how it can be improved within the framework of security and safety as part of the active development of Industry 4.0.For practitioners and scientists, the consequences of the results of the study may have some beneficial effect on the way the proposed model and its components work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it