MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385390879 · doi:10.24043/001c.84731

Island Studies Journal 16(2), Book Reviews

2021· article· en· W4385390879 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIsland Studies Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJapanese History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiminalityIdentity (music)HistoryEthnic groupImmigrationAnnexationColonialismGender studiesInterpretation (philosophy)GenealogySociologyAnthropologyAestheticsArtPolitical scienceLinguisticsLawArchaeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drawing upon extensive historical documents and life stories of Okinawan immigrants, Hiroko Matsuda's latest volume seeks to explore the relationship between the liminal status of Okinawans and their subjectivities in reproducing discursive boundaries in the period between Japan's annexation of the Ryukyus and the beginning of US military rule in Okinawa.Matsuda revisits the concept of liminality with a focus on the Okinawan immigrants residing in colonized Taiwan, the otherwise often under-represented ethnic group.Migration was a centuries-old process and has been much explored.The substantial body of literature cited in the book reveals that the shifts of Okinawan immigrants' identities were accompanied with the rise and fall of Japan's imperial expansion.Starting from the early 1920s, Okinawans moved across borders and were constantly translating their identities between colonial and colonized cultures.Among them, Okinawans in colonized Taiwan had grappled with identity problems of their own.Traditionally, the Japanese were positioned as the superior, the Taiwanese as the inferior, and the Okinawans between the two.In this book, Matsuda challenges the radical dichotomy of the colonizer and the colonized, arguing that "Okinawans cannot be simply understood through this inflexible hierarchical structure" (p.11).On the contrary, their status, evolved from the liminal character, was socially mediated.As noted at the very beginning of the book, the Okinawans enjoyed a historical identity "less dominant and exploitative" than the Japanese (p.1).Unlike many other border studies, this book sets out to provide a more diverse interpretation of the liminal status of the Okinawan immigrants, whose "in-betweeness" of identities was magnified in the colonized context of Taiwan and during the postwar period.This book is divided into six chapters with an epilogue.Chapter 1 provides an overview of Okinawan immigrants in Taiwan, as compared to the massive migration of Okinawans across the globe.Chapter 2 reviews the history of how the commercial, social, and cultural networks were developed between Yaeyama and colonial Taiwan.It is concluded that "Yaeyama's socioeconomic transformation as well as its liminal state between the Japanese nation and the empire" (p.57) had prompted the migration of Yaeyama islanders to a "civilized Taiwan".Chapter 3 illustrates Okinawans' struggles for survival in colonized Taiwan for career and educational advancement.In Chapter 4, Matsuda takes the discussion further by acknowledging the role of "imperial schooling" in empowering Okinawans to achieve social mobility.Medical education remained a powerful impetus for the migration of Okinawans to Taiwan.Chapters 5 and 6 are devoted to in-depth analysis of Okinawans' negotiation of new identities in colonized Taiwan and in postwar Okinawa under the US temporary rule.Matsuda calls into question the common assumption that assimilation was the only way for Okinawans to advance socially in Taiwan.Alternatively, some of the second and third generations of Okinawan immigrants made conscious efforts in asserting their Okinawan pride by means of creolization.But when Okinawan repatriates from Taiwan returned to their homeland after the collapse of the Japanese Empire, they were again marginalized as the "other" due to a lack of shared colonial experiences with islanders who survived the Battle of Okinawa and the rest of the Okinawan diaspora.They were forced to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIsland Studies JournalSame topicJapanese History and CultureFrench-language works237,207