MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385396668 · doi:10.1101/2023.07.27.550862

Accounting for genetic effect heterogeneity in fine-mapping and improving power to detect gene-environment interactions with SharePro

2023· preprint· en· W4385396668 on OpenAlexaff
Wenmin Zhang, Robert Sladek, Yue Li, Hamed S. Najafabadi, Josée Dupuis

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenome-wide association studyStatistical powerSample size determinationStatisticsGenetic associationComputational biologyFalse discovery rateContext (archaeology)Computer scienceBiologyEconometricsGeneticsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismMathematicsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Characterizing genetic effect heterogeneity across subpopulations with different environmental exposures is useful for identifying exposure-specific pathways, understanding biological mechanisms underlying disease heterogeneity and further pinpointing modifiable risk factors for disease prevention and management. Classical gene-by-environment interaction (GxE) analysis can be used to characterize genetic effect heterogeneity. However, it can have a high multiple testing burden in the context of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and requires a large sample size to achieve sufficient power. Methods We adapt a colocalization method, SharePro, to account for effect heterogeneity in finemapping and subsequently improve power for GxE analysis. Through joint fine-mapping of exposure stratified GWAS summary statistics, SharePro can greatly reduce multiple testing burden in GxE analysis. Results Through extensive simulation studies, we demonstrated that accounting for effect heterogeneity can improve power for fine-mapping. With efficient joint fine-mapping of exposure stratified GWAS summary statistics, SharePro alleviated multiple testing burden in GxE analysis and demonstrated improved power with well-controlled false discovery rate. Through analyses of smoking status stratified GWAS summary statistics, we identified genetic effects on lung function modulated by smoking status mapped to the genes CHRNA3 , ADAM19 and UBR1 . Additionally, using sex stratified GWAS summary statistics, we characterized sex differentiated genetic effects on fat distribution and provided biologically plausible candidates for functional follow-up studies. Conclusions We have developed an analytical framework to account for effect heterogeneity in finemapping and subsequently improve power for GxE analysis. The SharePro software for GxE analysis is openly available at https://github.com/zhwm/SharePro_gxe .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.055
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.055
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→