MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385397457 · doi:10.18733/cpi29698

The Unheard Voices, the Unheard Struggle: Una fuerza poderosa que lucha por expresarse

2023· article· gl· W4385397457 on OpenAlex
Noni Mendoza Reis, Rosalinda Quintanar-Sarellana, Enid Lee, Cecille DePass

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCultural and Pedagogical Inquiry · 2023
Typearticle
Languagegl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation in Rural Contexts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Call for Submissions for the Winter 2025 (Volume 16, No. 2) Special Issue of Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry entitled The Unheard Voices, the Unheard Struggle: Una fuerza poderosa que lucha por expresarse with Guest Co-Editors Noni Mendoza Reis, Rosalina Quintanar-Sarellana, Enid Lee and Cecille DePass.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.606
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.089 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it