MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385398128 · doi:10.1136/jnis-2023-snis.71

O-071 Estimation of optimal coil packing density using lagrangian particle tracking

2023· article· en· W4385398128 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David I. Bass, Laurel Marsh, Michael C. Barbour, Venkat Keshav Chivukula, Patrick Fillingham, Alberto Aliseda, Michael R. Levitt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAneurysmElectromagnetic coilMaterials scienceSphere packingShear stressEmbolizationPorosityParticle (ecology)Biomedical engineeringMechanicsComposite materialSurgeryPhysicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Aneurysm coil packing density has been studied as a surrogate for treatment outcome, but clinical results are conflicting. Previous work applying computational fluid dynamics simulations to coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms found that embolization increases residence time (RT) and lowers cumulative shear (shear history; SH) of blood components within the aneurysm dome, suggesting that embolization promotes clot formation via a low shear stress-mediated pathway associated with stagnation of flow.1 The goal of this investigation is to determine whether RT and SH can be used to identify optimal coil packing density for coiled cerebral aneurysm outcome prediction, using particle tracking simulations. Method Computational fluid dynamics simulations of patient-specific aneurysms were performed before and after coil embolization treatment. Massless particles were virtually injected and individually tracked in each simulation, and blood flow was simulated with patient-specific boundary conditions. The coil mass was treated as a porous medium with a porosity corresponding to the in vivo treatment packing density. Simulations were also run with porosities corresponding to 50%, 150%, and 200% of the in vivo treatment packing density for each subject. Results Five subjects were included. The relative decrease in the rate of particles entering an aneurysm had a strong correlation with increasing packing density (R2 = 0.944, P < 0.001). A packing density of approximately 33.3% resulted in approximately a 70% reduction in particles entering the aneurysm. Above this packing density, the absolute number of particles was considered to be too low to be statistically reliable, and therefore further particle tracking analyses focused on simulations with packing densities less than 33.3%. Within these simulations, increasing packing density was associated with a linear increase in RT (R2 = 0.462, P < 0.003) and a decrease in SH (R2 = 0.547, P < 0.001), with SH nearing 0 as packing density approached 33.3%. Conclusions The results show that increasing packing density has a predictable effect on biologically relevant metrics calculated via computational fluid dynamics with particle tracking. These changes are thought to reflect alterations in the biomechanical microenvironment that promote stable thrombus formation, which is critical for the success of endovascular therapies. Our results suggest that the maximal hemodynamic effects of packing density may be achieved near a 33.3% threshold. Reference Bass DI, Marsh LMM, Fillingham P, Lim D, Chivukula VK, Kim LJ, et al. Modeling the mechanical microenvironment of coiled cerebral aneurysms. J Biomech Eng. 2023;145(4):1-8. Disclosures D. Bass: None. L. Marsh: None. M. Barbour: None. V. Chivukula: None. P. Fillingham: None. L. Kim: None. A. Aliseda: None. M. Levitt: 1; C; Medtronic: Investigator-initiated unrestricted educational grant; consultant Stryker: Investigator-initiated unrestricted educational grant, Stryker: Investigator-initiated unrestricted educational grant. 2; C; Medtronic, Stereotaxis, Metis Innovative. 4; C; Fluid Biomed. 5; C; Aeaean Advisers. 6; C; JNIS and Frontiers in Surgery Editorial Boards.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications→French-language works237,207→