Strategic Planning for the Sustainable Development of Territorial Communities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Strategic planning for sustainable development is actively employed across various socioeconomic systems, but territorial communities are in most need due to the complexity of their socio-economic structure.One of the most significant and relevant challenges in this context is strategic planning itself.The primary objective of this article is to apply a methodological approach to enhance the effectiveness of strategic planning for the sustainable development of territorial communities, with an emphasis on the tactical and operational aspects of this process.The object of the study is the territorial community.The research methodology encompasses methodological aspects of modeling techniques that facilitate the sustainability planning process.The results obtained from the study can potentially improve the strategic planning process for sustainable development within a single territorial community by modeling the stages of tactical and operational activities.This study is constrained by considering the specifics of only one territorial community.Future research should focus on expanding the methodological approach and incorporating more elements of strategic planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it