MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385400411 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.180722

Exploring Factors Influencing Tourists' Environmentally Responsible Behavior for Snorkeling Tourism, Thailand

2023· article· en· W4385400411 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thanin Sangkhaduang, Aneak Sawain, Naiyana Kumgunsilp

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismBusinessEcotourismEnvironmentally friendlyEnvironmental planningAdvertisingMarketingGeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Snorkeling is one of the leading causes of marine environmental degradation in coastal destinations around the world, and tourists' irresponsible behavior is a major contributor.The development of environmentally responsible behavior among tourists has thus become critical in preventing and mitigating marine and coastal natural resource problems.Using the extended theory of planned behavior (TPB), this study aims to explore factors influencing tourists' environmentally responsible behavior.The study was conducted from June 1 to December 30, 2022, with 520 participants in Mu Koh Lanta and Hat Chao Mai Marine National Parks, Thailand.Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect the data.The collected data were analyzed by using SEM.The empirical findings show that extended TPB with sociopsychological components (such as environmental concern, environmental attitude, subjective norm, environmentally responsible behavioral intentions) and socioenvironmental factors (environmental knowledge) can explain tourists' environmentally responsible behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchFrench-language works237,207