MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385412655 · doi:10.1177/2325967123s00179

Poster 194: Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Comminuted Glenoid Fractures Using Distal Tibia Allograft Results in Excellent Post-Operative Outcomes

2023· article· en· W4385412655 on OpenAlexaffabout
JOSE CASTILLO DE LA PEÑA, Ivan Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder and Clavicle Injuries
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryFixation (population genetics)CoracoidPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Boney Bankart injuries with a fragment from the anterior rim of the glenoid are not the most frequent ones after an anterior shoulder dislocation but can cause severe impairment of the joint and residual instability directly related with the amount of bone avulsed. Different treatment options have been described including fixation or reconstruction of the glenoid bone using distal tibia allograft. The primary objective of this study is to analyze and compare clinical outcomes, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) scores, complication, and re-dislocation rates. Methods: This study included patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery for glenoid fracture between 2012-2020. Patients were included if they sustained a type Ia glenoid fracture according to Ideberg-Goss classification and if they were treated arthroscopically within three months of injury with one of two surgical techniques; Fixation (including fracture fragment reduction and fixation with screws, buttons, or sutures and anchors), and glenoid reconstruction. Patients were excluded if they had concomitant fractures to ipsilateral humerus or clavicle during injury and history of ipsilateral shoulder instability. Demographic information, WOSI scores, and complications related to the surgery, or new dislocation events were recorded. Results: Thirty-eight patients were included with both the fixation and reconstruction groups had similar demographics and baseline characteristics, except for the percentage of patients with comminution which was higher in the reconstruction group (p=0.04) (Table 1). Both the fixation and reconstruction groups has similar pre- and post-operative glenoid AP measurements (Table 1). Patient-reported outcomes were similar post-operatively between the two groups (p=0.546) (Figure 1). Conclusions: Arthroscopic glenoid fracture fixation has good outcomes but concerns exist regarding cartilage damage. Complex comminuted fracture patterns are suitable for reconstruction with patients achieving comparable outcomes to those who undergo fracture fixation. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic Journal of Sports MedicineSame topicShoulder and Clavicle InjuriesFrench-language works237,207