A Secure Sidechain for Decentralized Trading in Internet of Things
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sidechains allow transaction dissemination and execution outside the blockchain main network (i.e., the mainchain), enabling a scalable, efficient, and secure financial infrastructure for the Internet of Things (IoT) without trusting any central authority. Existing sidechains either have online requirements or rely on intensive computation on a central operator, which does not meet the needs of IoT for dynamic changes and high performance. This article proposes an alternative sidechain construction, called Cumulus, which meets the needs of IoT by leveraging the classic Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) consensus protocols, such as PBFT, that have commonly been applied in permissioned blockchains. Cumulus builds BFT-based sidechains atop public blockchains (e.g., Ethereum) using smart contracts and ensures the bidirectional safety of users’ assets. Cumulus sidechains periodically interact with the mainchain and submit checkpoints through representatives selected in an efficient and decentralized manner. The experiments show that Cumulus sidechains outperform rollup-based sidechains, and state-of-the-art sidechain constructions, achieving two and three orders of magnitude improvement in throughput and latency while retaining comparable operational cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".