MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385419971 · doi:10.3390/biochem3030008

Qualitative Shotgun Proteomics Strategy for Protein Expression Profiling of Fish Otoliths

2023· article· en· W4385419971 on OpenAlexafffund
Rick M. Rideout, Trevena N. Youssef, Aaron T. Adamack, Rince John, Alejandro Cohen, Travis D. Fridgen, Joseph Banoub

Bibliographic record

VenueBioChem · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityMemorial University of NewfoundlandFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsOtolithBiologyProteomicsGadusFish ProteinsShotgun proteomicsComputational biologyFish <Actinopterygii>FisheryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite decades of research on fish otoliths and their capacity to serve as biochronological recorders, much remains unknown about their protein composition, the mechanisms by which proteins are incorporated into the otolith matrix, or the potential for using otolith proteins to provide insight into aspects of fish life history. We examined the protein composition of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths using a state-of-the-art shotgun proteomics approach with liquid chromatography coupled to an electrospray ionization-orbitrap tandem mass spectrometer. In addition to previously known otolith matrix proteins, we discovered over 2000 proteins not previously identified in cod otoliths and more than 1500 proteins not previously identified in any fish otoliths. These included three novel proteins (Somatolactin, F-actin-capping protein subunit beta, Annexin) primarily involved in binding calcium ions and likely mediating crystal nucleation. However, most of the otolith proteins were not necessarily related to otolith formation but rather to other aspects of fish physiology. For example, we identified sex-related biomarkers for males (SPATA6 protein) and females (Vitellogenin-2-like protein). We highlight some noteworthy classes of proteins having diverse functions; however, the primary goal here is not to discuss each protein separately. The number and diverse roles of the proteins discovered in the otoliths suggest that proteomics could reveal critical life history information from archived otolith collections that could be invaluable for understanding aspects of fish biology and population ecology. This proof-of-concept methodology paper provides a novel methodology whereby otolith proteomics can be further explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioChemSame topicMarine and fisheries researchFrench-language works237,207