Enhancing Women’s Participation in Community Development Through Community Education for Sustainable Development in South-East Nigeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study focused on enhancing women's participation in community development through community education for sustainable development.Three research questions and three null hypotheses guided the study.Descriptive survey design was used for the study.The population for the study was 828 respondents from south-East states of Nigeria.Researchers' made questionnaire was the major instrument for the study.The research questions were analyzed using mean scores and standard deviation while the null hypotheses were tested using t-test statistics.Based on the analyses, the following major findings was established: (i) encouraging more rural dwellers to participate in agricultural production to enhance their income, providing employment opportunities by creating jobs for rural dwellers among others were how community education enhances socio-economic potentials of women, (ii) enhancing literacy education for rural women, improving capacity building among women among others were the community education that enhanced literacy capacity of women, (iii) inadequate provision of funds by the government for the enhancement of community education and inadequate support from donor agencies for community education among others were the constraints militating against community education in enhancing women's participation in community development.Based on the findings of the study, recommendations were made.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".