Simultaneous design and NMPC control under uncertainty and structural decisions: A discrete‐steepest descent algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this article, we address the integration of design and nonlinear model‐based control under uncertainty and structural decisions for naturally ordered structures. We propose an algorithmic framework to determine the optimal location of process units or streams over an ordered discrete set that operates in closed‐loop with a model‐based controller. The formulation corresponds to a mixed‐integer bilevel problem (MIBLP) that is transformed into a single‐level mixed‐integer nonlinear problem (MINLP) using a KKT transformation strategy. In our methodology, the integer decisions are partitioned into subsets called external variables, such that the MINLP is decomposed into an integer‐based master problem and primal subproblems with fixed discrete variables. The master and primal problems are solved using a Discrete‐Steepest Descent Algorithm (D‐SDA). We illustrate the discrete‐based methodology in a case study for a binary distillation column. The D‐SDA showed an improved performance compared to a benchmark continuous‐based formulation using differentiable distribution functions (DDFs).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".