Influence of Cause-Related Packaging on High Cultural Capital Consumers’ Purchase Intention Toward Snacking Products – Use of Consumption Value Theory
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, many FMCG marketers, due to the increased interest of consumers towards health and sustainability, started focusing on their product packaging with an association of causerelated packaging.Snacking product purchase is highest among high culture consumers, so this category was chosen for study.This research aims to understand the reason for purchasing a snacking product associated with any cause.Whether consumers are purchasing the product because of functional, emotional, hedonic, conditional, epistemic, or social values.The questionnaire was framed using a validated scale of consumption value theory.Cluster analysis was done using SPSS is an attempt to segregate the respondents into different consumer types.The study clustered the groups into three distinct groups.Social and emotional values and epistemic drive the first cluster, whereas the second cluster is purchasing the product because of hedonic value, and the last cluster is purchasing the product because of its functional value, and they are bothered about any cause association.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it