Lady Shallot and Her Nature in the Men's Fence; An Interdisciplinary Approach to Tennyson’s Poetry and Waterhouse Paintings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alfred Lord Tennyson’s “The Lady of Shallot” is the portrayal of a woman’s active confrontation with the patriarchal society. By the woman’s seclusion from the social interactions, Tennyson debunks the bitter reality embedded within the social structure and by the lady’s manifestation of bravery in her social activism so as to prove her individuality, he depicts the annihilation of the woman in revolting against patriarchy. Parallel to the subjugation of femininity in the poem, ecology shows a pattern of tranquility and chaos through which masculine cultural codes reveal themselves. John William Waterhouse, a contemporary painter with Tennyson, has portrayed three suggestive scenes of the poem; how he portrays femininity and nature is the manifestation of patriarchal manipulation of the two aforementioned concepts. In congruence with the mentioned analysis, ecofeminism, by attributing resemblances to femininity and ecology, aims to divulge the patriarchal injustice inflicted upon them; by giving awareness about the rights of women and nature, it tries to rehabilitate their genuine identity. With the application of ecofeminism on Tennyson’s poem and Waterhouse’s paintings, with an interdisciplinary approach, the author discloses the patriarchal subordination of women and nature. I do hope that by the ecofeminist reading of “The Lady of Shallot” and its projected paintings, the authentic rights of femininity and ecology are defended, the importance of interdisciplinary studies is highlighted and the awareness about the original identity of these concepts is created.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".