Modular Framework for the Solution of Boundary-coupled Multiphysics Problems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a modular multiphysics framework developed for OpenFOAM. The framework is built around an iterative implicit coupling scheme based on a multi-region partitioned approach. This scheme allows the implementation of formal implicit time-marching schemes, which improves the stability of strongly interacting coupled problems. This methodology allows physical interactions to be handled through specifically designed interface boundary conditions. It also allows region-specific solvers to be implemented as modular class solvers. The coupling methodology is handled with a main program that manages solver-specific actions. The aim of this framework is to facilitate the implementation and testing of new multiphysics coupling problems in an integrated code structure. To show the capabilities of the framework to integrate new physics, solvers and boundary conditions requirements are discussed. Also, three validated examples involving fluid-structure interactions, conjugate heat transfer, and fluid-structure-thermal interactions are presented. Although all these problems are boundary-coupled multiphysics problems, the framework is conceptually not limited to this kind of problems. The benefit of this work to the OpenFOAM community is a general and modular framework that facilitates the setup and solution of diversified multiphysics problems, and that illustrates the implementation of modular interface boundary conditions between physics regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it