MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385422683 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.180724

Environmental Assessment of the Impact of Atmospheric Air Pollution with Hydrogen Sulfide on the Health of the Population of Atyrau, Republic of Kazakhstan

2023· article· en· W4385422683 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Damilya Ryskalieva, Mansiya Yessenamanova, Samal Syrlybekkyzy, Е. Г. Королева, Zhanar Yessenamanova, Anar Tlepbergenova, Amanbay Izbassarov, Rimma Turekeldiyeva

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen sulfideAir pollutionAtmospheric pollutionEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental impact assessmentPollutionEnvironmental protectionAtmospheric airPopulationEnvironmental pollutionEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental planningEnvironmental healthAtmospheric sciencesChemistryGeologyMedicineSulfurMaterials sciencePolitical scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article analyzes the morbidity of newly identified patients in Atyrau, the Republic of Kazakhstan, also calculates the correlation between the content of hydrogen sulfide in the air and mortality from diseases for a year by decade from July 2021 to June 2022.According to the analysis of morbidity over ten years, it was determined that the maximum number was detected for respiratory diseases, in second place diseases of the circulatory systems, the number of which exceeds 16,000 and 2,000 patients per 100,000 people, respectively.The calculation of the correlation dependence showed a direct positive relationship between the content of hydrogen sulfide in the air and the mortality of people from diseases of the respiratory and circulatory systems (the correlation coefficient of which is 0.99 and 0.5 respectively), and there is a negative dependence on the mortality of neoplasm diseases (the correlation coefficient is (-0.09)).This study has limitations on data, since the incidence data were given only for decades, whereas the correlation dependence would be more accurate with more data.In the future, it's planned to continue this study and include calculations of the relationship between the number of patients and the content of hydrogen sulfide for each month.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→