Data-Driven Multi-Criteria Assessment Framework for Analyzing the Reliability of Bus Services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intelligent systems have been extensively used to improve the reliability of transport services as a result of technological advances. Despite the technical and methodological achievements, public transportation companies are still facing excessive challenges in assessing the performance and reliability of the system. This study establishes a data-driven multi-criteria decision-making model for prioritizing bus routes that illustrates both operator and consumer views on bus routes. The multi-criteria fuzzy outranking process is handled by ELECTRE III and Condorcet methods. The developed model utilizes alternative indices of bus travel-time reliability to fully capture the uncertain nature of the input data. The reliability assessment framework is based on automatic vehicle location (AVL) data which works as an effective evaluation system for enhanced service reliability on different routes network-wide. Using this model, bus transport companies can set a benchmark and a reliable ranking system for their bus routes. This hybrid prioritization framework is used for characterizing and enhancing transport network efficiency. The effectiveness of the model is examined by quantifying the reliability of eight bus routes controlled by the Qazvin public transportation system, in Iran. A wide range of AVL data sources is employed within an in-depth statistical analysis based on both user and operator preferences. According to the concordance matrix results, line 18 has been found to be superior to other bus routes, and the possibility of identifying less efficient bus routes has been fulfilled.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".