MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385431715 · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2023.105484

The utility of SARS-CoV-2 genomic data for informative clustering under different epidemiological scenarios and sampling

2023· article· en· W4385431715 on OpenAlexafffund
Benjamin Sobkowiak, Pouya Haghmaram, Natalie Prystajecky, James E. A. Zlosnik, John R. Tyson, Linda Hoang, Caroline Colijn

Bibliographic record

VenueInfection Genetics and Evolution · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Centre for Disease ControlSimon Fraser University
FundersMichael Smith Health Research BCGovernment of CanadaAustralian Government
KeywordsOutbreakTransmission (telecommunications)BiologyCluster analysisGenetic diversityPopulationCluster (spacecraft)Sampling (signal processing)Evolutionary biologyGeneticsStatisticsComputer scienceMedicineVirologyMathematicsEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Clustering pathogen sequence data is a common practice in epidemiology to gain insights into the genetic diversity and evolutionary relationships among pathogens. We can find groups of cases with a shared transmission history and common origin, as well as identifying transmission hotspots. Motivated by the experience of clustering SARS-CoV-2 cases using whole genome sequence data during the COVID-19 pandemic to aid with public health investigation, we investigated how differences in epidemiology and sampling can influence the composition of clusters that are identified. METHODS: We performed genomic clustering on simulated SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks produced with different transmission rates and levels of genomic diversity, along with varying the proportion of cases sampled. RESULTS: In single outbreaks with a low transmission rate, decreasing the sampling fraction resulted in multiple, separate clusters being identified where intermediate cases in transmission chains are missed. Outbreaks simulated with a high transmission rate were more robust to changes in the sampling fraction and largely resulted in a single cluster that included all sampled outbreak cases. When considering multiple outbreaks in a sampled jurisdiction seeded by different introductions, low genomic diversity between introduced cases caused outbreaks to be merged into large clusters. If the transmission and sampling fraction, and diversity between introductions was low, a combination of the spurious break-up of outbreaks and the linking of closely related cases in different outbreaks resulted in clusters that may appear informative, but these did not reflect the true underlying population structure. Conversely, genomic clusters matched the true population structure when there was relatively high diversity between introductions and a high transmission rate. CONCLUSION: Differences in epidemiology and sampling can impact our ability to identify genomic clusters that describe the underlying population structure. These findings can help to guide recommendations for the use of pathogen clustering in public health investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.229
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfection Genetics and EvolutionSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207