MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385431976 · doi:10.18280/jesa.560315

Comparative Performance Evaluation of Swarm Intelligence-Based FOPID Controllers for PMSM Speed Control

2023· article· fr· W4385431976 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectronic speed controlControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceSwarm intelligenceControl engineeringSwarm behaviourControl (management)Particle swarm optimizationArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a study focused on the design and performance evaluation of Fractional-Order Proportional-Integral-Derivative (FOPID) controllers for the speed control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (PMSMs).Effective speed control of PMSMs is of great importance in various applications such as robotics, electric vehicles, and industrial automation.However, achieving precise and efficient speed control poses several challenges due to the nonlinear and time-varying nature of PMSMs.To address these challenges, the study proposes the utilization of FOPID controllers, which offer advantages over traditional PID controllers, including improved robustness and greater flexibility in handling complex system dynamics.Additionally, the study explores the use of Swarm Intelligence (S.I.) algorithms for the design and tuning of FOPID controllers.Swarm Intelligence algorithms, such as Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), ant colony optimization (ACO), and Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), are known for their ability to effectively search and optimize complex parameter spaces.The main contribution of this work is the comparison and evaluation of PSO, GWO, and ACO algorithms for the design of FOPID controllers in PMSM speed control applications.The controllers are assessed through both simulations and experimental tests to analyze their performance in terms of speed-tracking accuracy, overshoot, and settling time.The key finding of the study is that the ACO-FOPID controller exhibits the best performance in terms of transient response.It achieves a rise time of 0.008978 s, a settling time of 0.01 s, and zero absolute time error (ITAE).These results indicate that the ACO-FOPID controller provides precise and fast speed control for PMSMs, making it a promising solution for practical applications.In summary, this study highlights the importance of PMSM speed control and the challenges associated with it.It introduces the FOPID controller as a potential solution and motivates the utilization of Swarm Intelligence algorithms for its design.The comparison of PSO, GWO, and ACO algorithms for FOPID controller design demonstrates the superiority of the ACO-FOPID controller in terms of transient response.This research contributes to the advancement of control systems for PMSMs and showcases the potential of Swarm Intelligence algorithms in optimizing complex control parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it