MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385434439 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-9579-3_9

The Master of Mashup

2023· book-chapter· en· W4385434439 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Parra Pennefather

Bibliographic record

VenueDesign Thinking · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArtistic and Creative Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMerge (version control)MashupCreativityLeverage (statistics)ArtComputer scienceMashingVisual artsMultimediaArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide WebPsychologyThe InternetInformation retrieval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter dives into how to leverage AI to prototype specific genres of art and writing, merge genres like Impressionism and pop art, mash up ideas, and explore the use of humor and parody. AI is a skilled masher-upper. The possibilities of using AI as a tool to explore and generate new forms of writing, images, music, and video are endless. From experimenting with specific genres, such as Impressionism, to mashing up ideas and incorporating humor and parody, the use of AI in prototyping provides endless opportunities for creativity and innovation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.214
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.062 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDesign ThinkingSame topicArtistic and Creative ResearchFrench-language works237,207