Evolutionary Monte Carlo of QM Properties in Chemical Space: Electrolyte Design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Optimizing a target function over the space of organic molecules is an important problem appearing in many fields of applied science but also a very difficult one due to the vast number of possible molecular systems. We propose an evolutionary Monte Carlo algorithm for solving such problems which is capable of straightforwardly tuning both exploration and exploitation characteristics of an optimization procedure while retaining favorable properties of genetic algorithms. The method, dubbed MOSAiCS ( M etropolis O ptimization by S ampling A daptively i n C hemical S pace), is tested on problems related to optimizing components of battery electrolytes, namely, minimizing solvation energy in water or maximizing dipole moment while enforcing a lower bound on the HOMO–LUMO gap; optimization was carried out over sets of molecular graphs inspired by QM9 and Electrolyte Genome Project (EGP) data sets. MOSAiCS reliably generated molecular candidates with good target quantity values, which were in most cases better than the ones found in QM9 or EGP. While the optimization results presented in this work sometimes required up to 10 6 QM calculations and were thus feasible only thanks to computationally efficient ab initio approximations of properties of interest, we discuss possible strategies for accelerating MOSAiCS using machine learning approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".