MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385442519 · doi:10.4155/bio-2023-0135

2022 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: Fda Draft Guidance on Immunogenicity Information in Prescription Drug Labeling, Lnp &amp; Viral Vectors Therapeutics/Vaccines Immunogenicity, Prolongation Effect, Ada Affinity, Risk-Based Approaches, Ngs, Qpcr, Ddpcr Assays ( <u>Part 3</u> – Recommendations on Gene Therapy, Cell Therapy, Vaccines Immunogenicity &amp; Technologies; Immunogenicity &amp; Risk Assessment of Biotherapeutics and Novel Modalities; NAb Assays Integrated Approach)

2023· article· en· W4385442519 on OpenAlexaff
Luying Pan, Johanna Mora, Karl Walravens, Leslie Wagner, Shirley Hopper, LiNa Loo, David Bettoun, Sarah Bond, Francis Dessy, Sean Downing, Fabio Garofolo, Soumi Gupta, Neil Henderson, Chad R. Irwin, Akiko Ishii‐Watabe, Sumit Kar, Vibha Jawa, Julie Joseph, Ludovic Malvaux, Jean‐Claude Marshall, Jessica McDevitt, Susovan Mohapatra, Jessica Seitzer, Justin Smith, Therese Solstad, Hiroshi Sugimoto, Omar Tounekti, Bonnie Wu, Yuling Wu, Yuanxin Xu, Joshua Xu, Takenori Yamamoto, Lin Yang, Albert Torri, Susan Kirshner, Kimberly Maxfield, Joao Pedras Vasconcelos, Mohsen Rajabi Abhari, Daniela Verthelyi, Eric Brodsky, Montserrat Carrasco‐Triguero, John Kamerud, Matthew Andisik, Daniel Baltrukonis, Nicoletta Bivi, Isabelle Cludts, Kelly Coble, Boris Gorovits, George R. Gunn, Swati Gupta, Anders Millner, Alison Joyce, Seema Kumar, Karen Liao, Mohanraj Manangeeswaran, Michael A. Partridge, Samuel Pine, Johann Poetzl, Manoj Rajadhyaksha, Michèle Rasamoelisolo, Susan Richards, Yuan Song, Steven J. Swanson, Seth G. Thacker, Meenu Wadhwa, A. Wolf, Lucia Zhang, Lin Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueBioanalysis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcellenceBioanalysisRegulatory scienceMedicineComputer sciencePolitical scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2022 16th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (WRIB) took place in Atlanta, GA, USA on September 26-30, 2022. Over 1000 professionals representing pharma/biotech companies, CROs, and multiple regulatory agencies convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 16th WRIB included 3 Main Workshops and 7 Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on ICH M10 BMV final guideline (focused on this guideline training, interpretation, adoption and transition); mass spectrometry innovation (focused on novel technologies, novel modalities, and novel challenges); and flow cytometry bioanalysis (rising of the 3rd most common/important technology in bioanalytical labs) were the special features of the 16th edition. As in previous years, WRIB continued to gather a wide diversity of international, industry opinion leaders and regulatory authority experts working on both small and large molecules as well as gene, cell therapies and vaccines to facilitate sharing and discussions focused on improving quality, increasing regulatory compliance, and achieving scientific excellence on bioanalytical issues. This 2022 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2022 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 3) covers the recommendations on Gene Therapy, Cell therapy, Vaccines and Biotherapeutics Immunogenicity. Part 1 (Mass Spectrometry and ICH M10) and Part 2 (LBA, Biomarkers/CDx and Cytometry) are published in volume 15 of Bioanalysis, issues 16 and 15 (2023), respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0260.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioanalysisSame topicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsFrench-language works237,207