MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385458844 · doi:10.47191/ijcsrr/v6-i8-02

Analysis of the Leadership Role on Employee Well-being. Study Case: HKBP District VIII DKI Jakarta

2023· article· en· W4385458844 on OpenAlex
Anna Christine Purba, Madju Yuni Ros Bangun

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Current Science Research and Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmployee Performance and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDisadvantagedCorporate governanceDecentralizationBusinessSocioeconomic statusPolitical sciencePublic relationsSociologyFinanceLawPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Employee well-being is high on the corporate agenda because companies and their boards of directors connect and correlate it with success. Employees’ eligibility for perks, insurance, and medical care is frequently determined by socioeconomic considerations. This means that disadvantaged groups are frequently left behind, although they require the most assistance. HKBP or Huria Kristen Batak Protestan is one of the largest church organizations among Protestant churches in Indonesia and Southeast Asia. As one of the largest churches in this country, HKBP should be an organization that can set an example in terms of organizational governance that is characterized by being clean, transparent, visionary, has access to the public, and is based on the needs of the congregation. But the hope to be an example, an example organizationally has not been realized properly because of turmoil from internal problems that went wrong. Currently, by looking at HKBP’s internals, it has even caused turmoil, and many inequalities and made HKBP’s management far from what we expected. There are even terms for HKBP wetland and dryland HKBP. Of course, this fact cannot be denied, even though all HKBP servants have made promises to be willing to be placed anywhere to preach the gospel. The struggle for churches that are wetlands and those who have financial resources is certainly one of the evaluation materials and a weakness of HKBP’s financial decentralization, where this does not at all reflect the life of God’s servants who should receive the assigned placement for each individual. This also shows that well-being is not evenly distributed and creates gaps among servants. This study aims to identify leadership roles to employee well-being, such as Job Performance, Ethics or Personal Characteristics, Communication or Feedback, and Justice or Fairness. To determine what has to be addressed and developed by leaders to improve the well-being of employees in HKBP District VIII DKI Jakarta can be seen from a leadership role on employee well-being indicators, such as Positive Emotions, Engagement, Relationship or Positive Relationships, Meaning, and Achievement (PERMA). Based on this research, the priority that must be improved in Leadership is Justice or Fairness. HKBP District VIII DKI Jakarta has to level up and maintain the existing program, such as seminars about self-development in leadership and annual programs to intensify the bond between the leader and fellow church ministries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.512
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it