MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385459653 · doi:10.1079/tourism.2023.0025

Scaling Up Sustainability: The Case of Big Wheel Burger

2023· article· en· W4385459653 on OpenAlexaffabout
Coughlan L.M., Rachel Dodds

Bibliographic record

VenueTourism Cases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisaster Management and Resilience
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaceDoorsBig businessNoticeSustainabilityAdvertisingSociologyMarketingPsychologyBusinessPolitical scienceEngineeringLawGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary After waking up from a 5-day coma after a sports injury, Calen McNeil did not want to waste his second chance at life and knew his purpose was to do something good and valuable. Big Wheel Burger has been adding locations at a steady pace since opening its doors in 2011 and was also Canada’s first carbon-neutral fast-food restaurant. With five locations currently open and another due to open later in 2023, Calen knew that his business model was a good one, but he also knew profits were not the only thing in question. Ever since the COVID-19 pandemic, he realized he wanted to play a bigger role in helping his community. The question was, how could he change his business model to have an even greater positive impact? Information © The Authors 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTourism CasesSame topicDisaster Management and ResilienceFrench-language works237,207