Efficacy and safety of Tongdutiaoshen acupuncture on insomnia in maintenance hemodialysis patients: A randomized clinical trial protocol
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: acupuncture in treating insomnia in patients with MHD. Methods: acupuncture (TA) group. Patients in the control group will be administered estazolam tablets (1 mg/day) for four weeks, followed by a 4-week follow-up period. Based on the background therapy provided for the DC group, the TA group will be administered the interventional cohort three times a week for four weeks in a row, followed by a 4-week follow-up period. The primary endpoints will include the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), TCM Insomnia Syndrome Score, and clinical response rate, which will be evaluated on days 0, 14, 28, and 56. Secondary endpoints will include sleep data monitoring and related laboratory indices, which will be evaluated on days 0, 28, and 56, respectively. Discussion: acupuncture for insomnia in patients undergoing hemodialysis. The findings of this trial will be published in peer-reviewed journals as reliable evidence. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200061967. Registered on July 07, 2022.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.043 | 0.071 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it