Design, modeling and economic performance of a vertical axis wind turbine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p><a href="https://www-sciencedirect-com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/topics/engineering/vertical-axis-wind-turbine" target="_blank">Vertical Axis Wind Turbine</a> (VAWT) is relatively simple to implement in urban areas on ground or/and building-roofs, the development of appropriate design of VAWT will open new opportunities for the large-scale acceptance of these machines. The primary objective of this research was to design and modeling of a small-scale VAWT, which can be used to meet the power for low demand applications. Two new shapes of <a href="https://www-sciencedirect-com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/topics/engineering/savonius-rotor" target="_blank">Savonius rotor</a> blades were examined in terms of their rotational performances against the conventional straight and the curved blades. MATLAB simulation was utilized to develop a mathematical model, which comprised of wind <a href="https://www-sciencedirect-com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/topics/engineering/power-coefficient" target="_blank">power coefficient</a>, tip speed ratio, mechanical and electrical subcomponents. The measured results of developed turbine were used for the validation of the model. The aims were to analyze the <a href="https://www-sciencedirect-com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/topics/engineering/blade-turbine" target="_blank">turbine blade</a> shapes, develop a mathematical algorithm, and to establish the techno-economic performance of the new curved shape design. It was modeled that the proposed turbine is capable of producing an annual energy output of 7838 kWh and the annual electricity cost/saving in Ontario turned out to be $846.51 (the price of electricity was taken $0.108/kWh).</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".