MultiplexMS: A Mass Spectrometry-Based Multiplexing Strategy for Ultra-High-Throughput Analysis of Complex Mixtures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-throughput chemical analysis of natural product mixtures lags behind developments in genome sequencing technologies and laboratory automation, leading to a disconnect between library-scale chemical and biological profiling that limits new molecule discovery. Here, we report a new orthogonal sample multiplexing strategy that can increase mass spectrometry-based profiling up to 30-fold over traditional methods. Profiled pooled samples undergo subsequent computational deconvolution to reconstruct peak lists for each sample in the set. We validated this approach using in silico experiments and demonstrated a high assignment precision (>97%) for large, pooled samples ( r = 30), particularly for infrequently occurring metabolites of relevance in drug discovery applications. Requiring only 5% of the previously required MS acquisition time, this approach was repeated in a recent biological activity profiling study on 925 natural product extracts, leading to the rediscovery of all previously reported bioactive metabolites. This new method is compatible with MS data from any instrument vendor and is supported by an open-source software package: https://github.com/liningtonlab/MultiplexMS .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".