MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385481139 · doi:10.1016/j.ibmed.2023.100103

Toward enhanced free-living fall risk assessment: Data mining and deep learning for environment and terrain classification

2023· article· en· W4385481139 on OpenAlexaff
Jason Moore, Samuel Stuart, Peter McMeekin, Richard Walker, Mina Nouredanesh, James Tung, Richard B. Reilly, Alan Godfrey

Bibliographic record

VenueIntelligence-Based Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooMcMaster University
FundersNational Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration WestNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNorthumbria University
KeywordsInertial measurement unitComputer scienceTerrainArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkWearable computerContext (archaeology)Classifier (UML)Deep learningMachine learningCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fall risk assessment can be informed by understanding mobility/gait. Contemporary mobility analysis is being progressed by wearable inertial measurement units (IMU). Typically, IMUs gather temporal mobility-based outcomes (e.g., step time) from labs/clinics or beyond, capturing data for habitually informed fall risk. However, a thorough understanding of free-living IMU-based mobility is currently limited due to a lack of context. For example, although IMU-based length variability can be measured, no absolute clarity exists for factors relating to those variations, which could be due to an intrinsic or an extrinsic environmental factor. For a thorough understanding of habitual-based fall risk assessment through IMU-based mobility outcomes, use of wearable video cameras is suggested. However, investigating video data is laborious i.e., watching and manually labelling environments. Additionally, it raises ethical issues such as privacy. Accordingly, automated artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, that draw upon heterogenous datasets to accurately classify environments, are needed. Here, a novel dataset was created through mining online video and a deep learning-based tool was created via chained convolutional neural networks enabling automated environment (indoor or outdoor) and terrain (e.g., carpet, grass) classification. The dataset contained 146,624 video-based images (environment: 79,251, floor visible: 28,347, terrain: 39,026). Upon training each classifier, the system achieved F1-scores of ≥0.84 when tested on a manually labelled unseen validation dataset (environment: 0.98, floor visible indoor: 0.86, floor visible outdoor: 0.96, terrain indoor: 0.84, terrain outdoor: 0.95). Testing on new data resulted in accuracies from 51 to 100% for isolated networks and 45–90% for complete model. This work is ongoing with the underlying AI being refined for improved classification accuracies to aid automated contextual analysis of mobility/gait and subsequent fall risk. Ongoing work involves primary data capture from within participants free-living environments to bolster dataset heterogeneity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntelligence-Based MedicineSame topicBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionFrench-language works237,207