MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385491122 · doi:10.53697/emak.v4i1.1113

Feasibility Study of Tobacco Farming in Patrang District, Jember Regency

2023· article· en· W4385491122 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Akuntansi dan Keuangan · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Development and Management
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultivation of tobaccoHectareAgricultureAgricultural scienceProductivityProfit (economics)Production (economics)Descriptive statisticsBusinessAgricultural economicsMathematicsGeographyEconomicsEnvironmental scienceStatisticsEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tobacco is one of the leading commodities in the agricultural sector. Tobacco is developed in several areas in Jember Regency, one of which is in Patrang District. This study aims to determine the use of production inputs in tobacco farming, production and productivity, income, and the feasibility of tobacco farming in Patrang District. Determination of the sample using a simple random method. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, farming income analysis, and farming feasibility analysis. The results of the analysis showed that (1) tobacco farmers in Patrang District use inputs of seeds, fertilizers, drugs, pesticides, tools and labor in carrying out tobacco farming; (2) the average production and productivity of tobacco per hectare is 4.42 ton and 0.96 ton/ha; (3) the average profit of tobacco farming is IDR 22.546.992,19; and (4) tobacco farming is feasible to develop that it can be seen from the R/C value is 2.4, the price BEP value is IDR 3,664 and the production BEP is 1,056 kilograms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it