POLITICAL ACCUSATIONS OF ARCHIMANDRITE VLADIMIR (FINKOVSKY) IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CONFRONTATION BETWEEN THE BNR RADA AND THE BCRIN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 1950s.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the history of opposition to the relocation of Archimandrite Vladimir (Finkovsky) to serve in the Belarusian parishes under the jurisdiction of the Patriarchate of Constantinople. Elected to the post of rector of the Belarusian parish in Toronto he could not enter the country after the message about the clergy's pro-Soviet sympathies received from the Canadian and American diplomatic missions. For a long time, the name of the author of this anonymous denunciation remained unknown. An appeal to declassified CIA documents from the Cold War period made it possible to establish that in 1956 and 1958 President of the Council of the Belarusian People's Republic N. Abramchik contacted with representatives of the CIA, trying to prevent Archimandrite Vladimir from moving to North America. At the same time, N. Abramchik used as an argument the accusation of the clergyman of sympathy for the Soviet political system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".