Effectiveness of regional diffusion MRI measures in distinguishing multiple sclerosis abnormalities within the cervical spinal cord
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system. Quantitative MRI has huge potential to provide intrinsic and normative values of tissue properties useful for diagnosis, prognosis and ultimately clinical follow-up of this disease. However, there is a large discrepancy between the clinical observations and how the pathology is exhibited in MRI brain scans. Complementary to brain imaging, the study of multiple sclerosis lesions in the spinal cord has recently gained interest as a potential marker for early physical impairment. Therefore, investigating how the spinal cord is damaged using quantitative imaging, in particular, diffusion MRI, becomes an acute challenge. In this work, we extract average diffusion MRI metrics per vertebral level from spinal cord data acquired from multiple clinical sites. The diffusion-based metrics involved are extracted from the diffusion tensor imaging and Ball-and-Stick models and quantified for every cervical vertebral level using a collection of image processing methods and an atlas-based approach. Then, we perform a statistical analysis study to characterize the feasibility of these metrics to detect lesions. Specifically, we study the usefulness of combining different metrics to improve the accuracy prediction score associated with the presence of multiple sclerosis lesions. We demonstrate the grade of sensitivity to underlying microstructure changes in MS patients of each metric. Ball-and-Stick provides novel information about the MS damage to tissue microstructure. In addition, we show that choosing a subset of metrics: [FA, RD, MD] and [FWW, MD, Stick-AD, RD], which bring complementary information, has significantly increased the prediction score of the presence of the MS lesion in the cervical spinal cord.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".