MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385505007 · doi:10.24036/00614kons2023

Group counseling services with a Gestalt approach to coping with quarter life crisis

2021· article· en· W4385505007 on OpenAlex
Lia Mita Syahri

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCounseling and Humanities Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Therapy and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Gestalt psychologySadnessPsychologyCoping (psychology)AnxietyCrisis interventionSocial psychologyClinical psychologyPsychiatryHistoryAngerPerception

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As people get older, individuals will think about what their future state will be, each individual has a different view of the future, many individuals are trapped in a state of anxiety, fear and sadness even to the point of being stressed when they have to be faced with the question of how the future will be. , this is known as the quarter life crisis. The purpose of this study is to help individuals overcome the quarter life crisis by using the approach given in groups. This type of research is a literature study by utilizing articles or journals related to group counseling, the gestalt approach and the quarter life crisis. The findings of this study reveal that using the gestalt approach by means of group counseling is effective in helping individuals who are experiencing a quarter life crisis, one of the techniques used is the practice of being responsible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it