MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385506836 · doi:10.21741/9781644902592-69

Numerical study on the effect of real gas model on the flow structure and shock location of Laval nozzle

2023· article· en· W4385506836 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B.I. Jasem

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials research proceedings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupersonic speedMach numberNozzleReal gasShock (circulatory)Ideal gasMechanicsPosition (finance)Choked flowShock waveFlow (mathematics)Computational fluid dynamicsOverall pressure ratioShock diamondAerospace engineeringPhysicsMach waveEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Design of supersonic nozzle requires accurate and robust procedure since the flow becomes subtle during shifting from subsonic to supersonic. This article presents some aspects of the fluid features at supersonic region when it behaves as real gas using 3D-numerical simulation. The objectives include the variation in the shock position, the fluid properties, and the real gas model at different Nozzle-Pressure-Ratio (NPR). Results of CFD simulation showed that ideal gas model predicts higher Mach number than any real gas model. Also, the prediction is different between SRK and BWR models. The erroneous in predicating Mach number approaches 21% for SRK and 43% for BWR. For the range of NPR 2-3, shock position is found to be proportion to NPR; however, significant discrepancy in the shock location is observed when ideal gas verses real gas is assumed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials research proceedingsSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207