MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385516783 · doi:10.1109/ectc51909.2023.00365

Secure and Scalable Key Management for Waferscale Heterogeneous Integration

2023· article· en· W4385516783 on OpenAlexaff
Yousef Safari, Pooya Aghanoury, Subramanian S. Iyer, Nader Sehatbakhsh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceKey managementKey (lock)ScalabilityLeverage (statistics)EncryptionOverhead (engineering)Distributed computingComputer securityDatabaseOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we assess PUF-based key management in emerging Chiplet technology. Our central idea is to leverage an existing capability in modern chiplet systems called utility dies (UD) and use it to provide security services (e.g., key management, encryption) to all functional chiplets on a wafer. We evaluate our design in a complex chiplet system. Specifically, we report system-related metrics of our implementation, including performance, power, and area overhead in a modern many-core chiplet system. Our evaluations show that the proposed design incurs negligible overhead and provides a viable option for key management in a complex chiplet system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityFrench-language works237,207