MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385519703 · doi:10.32316/hse-rhe.vi0.5155

Margaret A. Nash and Karen L. Graves, Mad River, Marjorie Rowland, and the Quest for LGBTQ Teachers' Rights

2023· article· en· W4385519703 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cris Mayo

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic Freedom and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGay rightsSociologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This wonderfully complex book, Mad River, Marjorie Rowland, and the Quest for LGBTQ Teachers' Rights, examines the ripple effects of Marjorie Rowland's attempt to gain recognition for the discrimination she faced as a bisexual teacher in 1974.Nash and Graves wind together Rowland's personal experiences with the burgeoning legal theories that initiated LGBTQ-related employment equity claims and provide intricate analysis of the multiple ways that such claims have been refused, sidestepped, and otherwise resisted by courts and employers, even when legislative progress has been seemingly made.This apparently ever-timely examination of the challenges facing recognition of LGBTQ rights is an important reminder that progress all too often is not linear.Further, the authors remind us that anti-LGBTQ backlash is also all too often directed at education and educators (and students as well).As Nash and Graves point out, while gay rights began to make progress in the 1970s, conservatives focused their energies on removing gay and lesbian teachers from schools.Graves' And They Were Wonderful Teachers provides an excellent account of teacher purges in Florida.Rowland undertook a series of court challenges when she was fired from her school counselling job for telling another employee she was bisexual and eventually tried appealing to the Supreme Court.When Supreme Court Justice William Brennan dissented from the court's determination to not hear Rowland's case, he pointed out the historical and contemporary discriminations facing gay people and the public concern of Rowland's words, two aspects of her case that the Supreme Court and other courts had denied.His dissent had an impact well beyond her case: it helped bolster LGBTQ-related employment discrimination cases that followed, including those of other educators as well as those serving in the military.Like Rowland's unsuccessful bid to have her freedom of speech protected as a bisexual woman, Brennan's dissent, while unable to directly help Rowland, went on to open the cracks in legal unwillingness to recognize LGBTQ people.Nash and Graves carefully note the shifts in legal strategy from early cases like Rowland's that relied on freedom of speech to the more recent trend of using due process and dignity.(The latter two strategies were recently called into question by Justice Thomas's concurrent decision in Dobbs.)While showing these theoretical complications, this book also shows how LGBTQ equality has been built and the sacrifices of those LGBTQ people, like Rowland, whose livelihoods and careers were upended but who kept going.Nash and Graves caution, too, that even if legal strategies work and laws are reformed to include LGBTQ people under non-discrimination policies, school administrators and districts find ways to fire LGBTQ educators using trumped up excuses.As local practices, policies and, in too many cases, state laws continue to obstruct LGBTQ rights, the lessons in this book are important reminders of the continuity of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducationSame topicAcademic Freedom and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207