MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385520335 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2022-0295

The effect of climate change combined with clogged joints on bridge integrity in Canada

2023· article· en· W4385520335 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Musab Nassar, Lamya Amleh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeBridge (graph theory)Vulnerability (computing)Expansion jointResource (disambiguation)Environmental scienceCivil engineeringForensic engineeringEnvironmental resource managementEngineeringComputer scienceGeologyComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the impact of climate change combined with clogged expansion joints on the integrity of four typical I- and box-girder bridges in Canada. The investigation considers 10 different climate regions across the country. The results reveal that the accumulation of debris, including compacted ice in expansion joints, poses a significant threat to bridge structures. Winnipeg and Saskatoon are identified as the most vulnerable regions to projected temperature changes with restricted movement, while Vancouver shows the lowest susceptibility. The study recommends classifying climate regions based on their vulnerability to climate change to facilitate resource allocation for bridge maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement. Furthermore, a formula is introduced to assess and prioritize critical bridges in Canada’s extensive inventory, offering a systematic and objective approach to efficient resource allocation for bridge maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicConcrete Corrosion and DurabilityFrench-language works237,207