Privacy-Preserving Federated Recurrent Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present RHODE, a novel system that enables privacy-preserving training of and prediction on Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) in a cross-silo federated learning setting by relying on multiparty homomorphic encryption. RHODE preserves the confidentiality of the training data, the model, and the prediction data; and it mitigates federated learning attacks that target the gradients under a passive-adversary threat model. We propose a packing scheme, multi-dimensional packing, for a better utilization of Single Instruction, Multiple Data (SIMD) operations under encryption. With multi-dimensional packing, RHODE enables the efficient processing, in parallel, of a batch of samples. To avoid the exploding gradients problem, RHODE provides several clipping approximations for performing gradient clipping under encryption. We experimentally show that the model performance with RHODE remains similar to non-secure solutions both for homogeneous and heterogeneous data distributions among the data holders. Our experimental evaluation shows that RHODE scales linearly with the number of data holders and the number of timesteps, sub-linearly and sub-quadratically with the number of features and the number of hidden units of RNNs, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, RHODE is the first system that provides the building blocks for the training of RNNs and its variants, under encryption in a federated learning setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".