Bibliographic record
Abstract
M y first acknowledgment is to Vogar, Manitoba.Vogar, meaning "coves" in Icelandic, is located on the eastern shore of Lake Manitoba in Treaty 2 territory.At the end of the nineteenth century, the Ojibwe and Metis residents of the region were confronted with an influx of immigrants from Iceland, including my great-great-grandparents Jörundur Sigurbjörnsson Eyford and Anna Jónasdóttir.The Icelanders claimed home steads around the Dog Creek Indian Reserve.The farm where I spent the early part of my childhood sits between the reserve and the Metis village of Vogar.The spatial segregation of First Nations, Metis, and Euro-Canadians, established by the Dominion Lands Act and the Indian Act, was, and remains, an inescapable fact of life in the region.Although Vogar doesn't figure into this book directly, my origins in that place have unquestionably helped to shape my thinking about the history of colonization in Western Canada.My second acknowledgment is to Jennifer S.H. Brown, who first helped me to think about that history from a scholarly perspective.In 1999, I was an undergraduate student in Professor Brown's "Natives and Newcomers" seminar at the University of Winnipeg.She suggested that I write my research paper on relations between Aboriginal people and Icelanders in the Manitoba Interlake.She also shared two unpublished papers on the sub ject by Anne Brydon and Winona Stevenson (now Wheeler) that guided me to some of the archival sources that remain central to this study.I want to thank Jennifer Brown for introducing me to the study of Indigenous x Acknowledgments history and for her generosity in sharing teaching materials when I returned to the University of Winnipeg as a faculty member in 2010.She also did me the favour of putting me in contact with Ruth Christie, a Cree storyteller and descendant of both Joseph Monkman and John Ramsay who appear in the following chapters.My thanks go to Ruth for several enjoyable conversations about her ancestors and the many Indigenous-Icelandic connections around Lake Winnipeg.This book has benefitted from the insightful critiques and sage advice of several outstanding historians.My list of debts to Adele Perry is too long to detail here.Suffice it to say that she gave generously of her time and expertise in helping me refine my ideas about the linkages between immigration and colonialism in Western Canada.Gerry Friesen pushed me to sharpen my arguments about the spatial dynamics of colonization over many lunches in St. John's College.In Iceland, Guðmundur Hálfdánarson provided helpful feedback on some early drafts and assisted me in applying for Icelandic research funding.Royden Loewen gave important encouragement, especially since we became department colleagues.Many other friends and colleagues past and present in the history departments at the Universities of Manitoba and Winnipeg helped me in a variety of ways, including
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.379 | 0.247 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".