MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385532261 · doi:10.1515/9780773567832-001

Acknowledgments

2000· book-chapter· en· W4385532261 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooks · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFreedom of Expression and Defamation
Canadian institutionsYork UniversitySimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaLibrary and Archives CanadaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the spirit of opposition I begin where others end.My wife, Anna, and my children, Sarah and Aidan, have put up with me for more years than I care to remember, and helped me through many late nights of self-doubt.They have made me a better scholar, father, and friend.I owe a great debt of gratitude to the entire staff of the Queen's history office, especially to Ruth Bryson and Margaret Nash.Both retired during the transformation of my thesis into this book; maybe they were trying to tell me something.I also wish to thank the archivists and staff at the Burnaby Village Heritage Museum, the Metro Toronto Reference

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2340.127

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooksSame topicFreedom of Expression and DefamationFrench-language works237,207