MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385532991 · doi:10.1515/9780773570016-001

Foreword

2002· book-chapter· fr· W4385532991 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooks · 2002
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFashion and Cultural Textiles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1969 Montreal's Karen Bulow Ltd., Canada's largest hand-weaving firm, was invited to act as a consultant for a proposed new industry in the Arctic.In June of that year I was hired as a project manager and I began product development in Montreal.I headed north the following February, full of excitement and ambition and into history.This was a trip that changed not only my life forever but also that of the entire community of Pangnirtung.Nestled at the edge of a majestic fjord, Pangnirtung (Panniqtuuq) was selected because the women were superb embroiderers, and of course, Inuit women everywhere possessed unparalleled sewing skills.The lives of the Inuit were fast changing, moving from their traditional ways to a more urbanized environment.Employment for the women was necessary.But hand-weaving?In a culture that had no tradition of fibre manipulation and had never seen a loom before?By mid-February the looms moved into action, translating the amauti sashes into ribbons of glorious colour and design.The first weavers -Meeka Akpalialuk, Classic Akulukjuk, Jeanie Dialla, and Peah Naulalik -were soon joined by Meeka Arnaqaq and in a month these amazing women were at a point that I hoped that they might be in six.We received a commission to make sashes for the Scouts for a jamboree.Special sashes were woven to present to Queen Elizabeth and her family, who came to celebrate the centennial of the Northwest Territories.History was happening.Initially, production items were the foundation of the studio, and it was important to have products that would logically come from the Arctic: blankets, scarves, parka braids, and so on.Everything had to be top quality, using exciting colour, material, and design, perfectly woven, and slickly labelled and packaged.What a compliment to receive a hesitant response from one retailer that he would try to sell the samples that I sent him, but he wasn't sure since "they are too good to have come from the north"!He reordered within a month!As the weavers' skill developed, it was natural to move into tapestry, where the wonderful imagery of the Inuit could be expressed in a new medium.Initial explorations showed a style akin to the Navajo with strong geometries and bold colours -exciting but perhaps not appropriate.Drawings were then purchased from the community.The weavers made their selection, chose the colours, and translated the images into tapestry.Wonderful domestic scenes blossomed from the looms.The reactions were positive and encouraging, but I was not satisfied.The tapestries needed drama and excitement.I approached Malaya Akulukjuk, a known shaman in the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6500.641

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill-Queen's University Press eBooksSame topicFashion and Cultural TextilesFrench-language works237,207