MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385534766 · doi:10.3998/mpub.12769443

Cripping Girlhood

2023· book· en· W4385534766 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anastasia Todd

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Michigan Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaTemple UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaPurdue UniversityYale University
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grandpa, John-your confidence in me and support has meant so much to me over the years.To Momo-my best friend and partner.There are no words that could convey my deepest gratitude to you.Not only have your brilliant insights helped shape this book for the better, but you have taught me the importance of trusting myself in spite of myself.My deepest gratitude to the countless others who have helped move me and this book forward, especially my therapists, psychiatrists, and my students at UK. Lastly, I hope to do justice

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0960.049

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Michigan Press eBooksSame topicCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsFrench-language works237,207