Bibliographic record
Abstract
ASEAN see Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) Asian Bond Markets Initiative (ABMI) and regional stabilization 306-7 see also Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Asian Bond Markets Initiative (ABMI) Asian Currency Unit (ACU) Asian Development Bank's role in 294-305, 311 feasibility of 309-10 purpose of 294-5 Asian Development Bank (ADB) and Asian Bond Markets Initiative (ABMI) 302-4 Charter of the 297-8, 307, 311 and the Chiang Mai Initiative (CMIM) 301-2 and comparison with the World Bank 304 implied powers of the 298-9 and internal interpretation procedures 299-300 purposes of 297-8 and Regional Cooperation and Integration (RCI) Strategy 300-301 see also Asian Currency Unit (ACU), Asian Development Bank's role in Asian Economic Community 123, 148 Asian Monetary Fund (AMF) and Asian Consensus 290-92 and Beijing Consensus 290-91 benefi ts of 292-3 Japan's promotion of 288-9 and regional support for 289-90 see also Multilateralized Chiang Mai Initiative and Asian Monetary Fund Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) +3 11, 15, 18, 22, 23, 24 see also Multilateralized Chiang Mai Initiative and ASEAN+3 and the 1996 Protocol on Enhanced Dispute Settlement Mechanism 150, 161-2 and the 2004 Protocol on Enhanced Dispute Settlement Mechanism 150, 162, 179 and the 2010 Protocol to the ASEAN Charter on Dispute Settlement Mechanisms 150 and aspiration towards an economic community 154 and early trade initiatives 153 and the Chiang Mai Initiative (CMIM), role in 282 and China Free Trade Area 106, 108, 188 and China, view of 107-8 composition of 280-81 culture of 176-9 and dispute settlement mechanisms 160-61, 170, 173, 176, 178, 179-81 and dispute settlement mechanisms, trade-specifi c 161-4 and free trade agreement with China 13, 27, 28, 29, 44-5, 142 and free trade agreement with India 28, 29 and Free Trade Area (AFTA) 27, 28, 29 history of 152 intra-ASEAN disputes 164-8 and investment agreements with Northeast Asian countries 187-9 325
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.628 | 0.496 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".