MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385539532 · doi:10.1017/9781009320924.004

When Scarlet Fever Came to This Country

2023· book-chapter· en· W4385539532 on OpenAlexaffabout
Liza Piper

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScarlet feverGeographyPandemicColonialismInfluenza pandemicDemographyHistoryInfectious disease (medical specialty)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineDiseaseArchaeologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scarlet fever in the 1860s affected people along the Yukon and Mackenzie rivers and was perceived at the time as the most significant nineteenth-century epidemic. It was also connected to a much larger scarlet fever pandemic. Combined with influenza, scarlet fever moved down rivers, through trade posts, and into camps, illuminating how local relations with people and the land shaped the pandemic. This chapter conveys the scale of this sickness through estimates of deaths and the geographic extent of disease spread. The chapter then assesses the effects of ill health and mortality, the loss of adults and children, on the larger processes of colonial change underway in the nineteenth century, including the creation of northern residential schools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis→French-language works237,207→