MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385558358 · doi:10.1353/hir.2023.a903839

A Poetry of Things: The Material Lyric in Habsburg Spain by Mary E. Barnard (review)

2023· article· en· W4385558358 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Felipe Valencia

Bibliographic record

VenueHispanic Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Spanish Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryArtHumanismReignLiteratureContemplationArt historyHistoryPhilosophyTheologyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: A Poetry of Things: The Material Lyric in Habsburg Spain by Mary E. Barnard Felipe Valencia Keywords Felipe Valencia, Mary E. Barnard, Early Modern Spanish Poetry, Luis De Góngora, Luisa De Carvajal Y Mendoza, Juan De Arguijo, Francisco De Quevedo, Material Lyric barnard, mary e. A Poetry of Things: The Material Lyric in Habsburg Spain. U of Toronto P, 2022, x + 175 pp., 24 illustrations. In A Poetry of Things: The Material Lyric in Habsburg Spain, Mary E. Barnard studies poems “in which objects are endowed with agency to stage interactive performances with readers and viewers for mediating cultural and historical memory” and, more generally, poems that make “reference” to “concrete objects” in the work of four Spanish authors from the early seventeenth century (14, 129). Objects in these poets serve “as vehicles for exploring issues of moment in Philip III’s Spain: the preservation of humanist learning in the age of print; the collapse of empires, specifically of imperial Rome and implicitly of Habsburg Spain; the role of learned academies in the literary and artistic life beyond the court; the formation of subjective identities within distinct social spaces; and the role of religious objects in the tradition of spirituality of Counter-Reformation Spain” (13). The investment on the part of the court of Philip III (r. 1598–1621)—particularly his valido, the Duke of Lerma—in collecting and displaying lavish works of art warrants Barnard’s focus on poetry from his reign. A Poetry of Things builds upon her previous monograph, Garcilaso de la Vega and the Material Culture of [End Page 475] Renaissance Europe.1 Therefore, she selects four poets who, in her estimation, through their use of Italianate forms, their foregrounding of an imperial subject and their practices of imitation, inherited and carried into the Baroque Garcilaso’s project of “a vibrant material lyric in which objects served as sites of discourse and cultural exchange” (4). The book comprises an introduction, five chapters and a brief epilogue. Chapters 1 and 2 examine poems by Francisco de Quevedo (1580–1645), the humanist and politician whose upbringing at court afforded him familiarity with precious works of art as privileged sites of meaning. In the first chapter, Barnard focuses on “‘conversations’ with the past through objects” in the sonnet that famously begins “Retirado en la paz de estos desiertos,” the epitaph sonnets devoted to Christopher Columbus and Pedro Téllez Girón, Duke of Osuna, and the silva “Al pincel” (11). Barnard shows that in these poems, Quevedo ascribes agency to objects—books, a piece of wood from Columbus’s carrack, a funerary marble slab, the paintbrush—so that they may recover and preserve the humanist learning or the memory of imperial deeds that otherwise would be ravaged by time. Throughout the chapter, Barnard relies on Michel de Certeau’s notion of the practice of place as, in her words, “the human interactions by readers, passers-by and viewers” that activate objects and invest them with meaning (40).2 The following chapter, dedicated to the silva “A Roma antigua y moderna,” argues that Quevedo follows the humanist script of reading the ruined cityscape of ancient Rome through classical texts, thereby relating the physical landscape to its cultural impress, what Carl Sauer called the morphology of landscape.3 Chapter 3 turns to the Fábula de Polifemo y Galatea (1612) by Luis de Góngora (1561–1627), which is, according to Barnard, “a set of landscapes replete with objects, where even time and sonority are materialized” (12). Each of these landscapes is a “lived space that is produced by a defining performative act” (87). They are, to wit: the Count of Niebla’s estate, activated by the hunt at dawn (lines 1–24); the titular cyclops’s cave and the objects he hoards (25–94); the shoreline where desire for Galatea reigns supreme (95–136); the locus [End Page 476] amoenus where she and Acis have their midday erotic encounter (177–336); and Polyphemus’s realm as he sings his song of melancholy introspection and unleashes jealous violence at dusk (337–504). In chapter 4, Barnard ventures that two mythological sonnets by Juan de Arguijo (1567–c. 1622...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHispanic ReviewSame topicEarly Modern Spanish LiteratureFrench-language works237,207