MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385561117 · doi:10.59737/jpmpi.v1i1.22

Sosialisasi Manfaat Wedang Uwuh Ke Masyarakat Dalam Rangka Pencegahan Covid-19) Di Dusun Gandok, Condongcatur, Depok, Sleman, Yogyakarta

2021· article· id· W4385561117 on OpenAlexaff
Jarot Yogi Hernawan

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Permata Indonesia · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCOVID-19 Prevention and Impact
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pemanfaatan rempah-rempah dapur untuk imunitas tubuh menjadikan kami untuk membuat wedang uwuh sebagai bentuk pengabdian dan upaya pencegaahan Covid-19. Wedang uwuh merupakan minuman yang terbuat dari bahan-bahan alami seperti rimpang jahe emprit yang dimemarkan, daun pala kering, daun cengkeh kering, daun kayu manis kering dan gula jawa yang kemudian diseduh dengan air mendidih. metode pelaksanaan Kegiatan PPM ini dilakukan secara langsung terjun ke lapangan bertemu dengan warga yang berada di Padukuhan Gandok yang berada di wilayah Dusun Gandok RT 4, 5, 6, dan 7. Pelaksanaan kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini meliputi sosialisasi terkait manfaat wedang uwuh untuk pencegahan Covid-19 dengan meningkatkan imunitas tubuh kepada setiap keluarga di RT tersebut. Kegiatan ini tidak hanya melibatkan ketua dan anggota dari acara ini melainkan para pemangku kebijakan di wilayah tersebut. Tujuan dari kegiatan ini diadakan adalah untuk memanfaatkan wedang uwuh untuk pencegahan Covid-19 sebagai salah satu pencegahan Covid-19 adalah dengan meningkatkan imunitas tubuh. Pelaksana kegiatan berharap semoga dengan metode seperti ini bisa menginspirasi banyak pihak sehingga dapat tercipta semangat gotong royong untuk bisa mewujudkan kondisi wilayah yang aman dan sehat. Kesimpulan masyarakat diharapkan mulai menyadari akan manfaat wedang uwuh untuk pencegahan Covid-19 dengan meningkatkan imunitas tubuh.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Permata IndonesiaSame topicCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactFrench-language works237,207