Cyclic Loading Test and Numerical Modeling on Prefabricated UHPC Tube–Confined Rectangular Bridge Piers with Different Base Connections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers, one of the most widely used pier types, are vulnerable to damage during an earthquake and may not have sufficient durability against the harsh environment. To tackle these problems, a prefabricated UHPC tube, as the permanent formwork, was proposed to replace the cover concrete of the RC piers in enhancing the seismic performance of RC bridge piers. In this study, cyclic loading tests and numerical analyses were conducted to evaluate the efficiency of the UHPC tube. Three specimens, including one reference RC column and two prefabricated UHPC tube–confined (PUTC) columns, were fabricated and tested under quasi-static cyclic load. For specimen PUTC1, the prefabricated tube is disconnected from the footing at the column base. To utilize the tensile strength of UHPC (greater than 6 MPa), the tube is embedded into the footing in specimen PUTC2. The numerical study is performed to further examine the effects of six design parameters on the cyclic responses of the PUTC columns. The results demonstrated that the use of the UHPC tube can significantly enhance the seismic performance of the RC columns and reduce their seismic damage. The tube-to-footing connection noticeably affects the cyclic behavior of the PUTC columns. Due to the contribution of the UHPC tensile strength, embedding the UHPC tube into the footing can reduce the measured strain of the longitudinal reinforcements inside the footing. The embedded connection improves the maximum lateral force and displacement ductility by 26.0 and 8.3%, respectively, compared with the pier with the unembedded UHPC tube. The PUTC column with embedded UHPC tube exhibits less residual deformation because of the bridging effect of the steel fibers and confinement effect of the tube. When the UHPC tube is properly designed, it can be used to fully substitute transverse reinforcements and partially substitute longitudinal reinforcements in the PUTC columns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".