Comparison of isometric strength in rotator cuff and scapulothoracic muscles between elite volleyball athletes versus non-athletes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Volleyball is an exceptionally popular global sport that involves repetitive, rapid, powerful and wide overhead movements, which can seriously alter normal shoulder kinematics. A recognized hallmark of shoulder muscle balance is the ratio of shoulder external (ER) and internal (IR) rotators. By extension, objective measurement of shoulder muscles' strength could help identify at risk athletes and preempt those injuries by engaging in prescriptive strength training programs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study measured the isometric strengths of 1) shoulder internal and external rotator muscles, as well as the 2) supraspinatus, 3) rhomboid, and 4) middle and inferior trapezius muscles, in addition to calculation of ER:IR ratios, in professional volleyball players as well as in non-athletes. Measurements were made for dominant- and non-dominant upper limbs, in different position of the body (supine and orthostatic) and in different position of upper limb (adducted and abducted position). Our subject population included 11 male professional volleyball players as well as 14 healthy male orthopedic interns from Orthopedics and Trauma school of University of Milano Bicocca. Strengths were assessed by a handheld dynamometer. Each subject's isometric strength was assessed in triplicate in each limb position through a "make test" procedure; the greatest of each triplicate value was the accepted measure of isometric strength. RESULTS: We observed a gradient in muscle strength in the scapulothoracic complex in both groups; the rhomboid, middle trapezius, and lower trapezius ranked from greatest to least strength, respectively. The data suggest also that intrarotators are stronger in rotation adducted position than in rotation abducted position; however, extrarotators seem to be weaker in rotation adducted position than in rotation abducted position. There is also some indication that force development is enhanced in the supine position compared with the orthostatic position. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a scapulothoracic strength gradient with a rank order of strength of the rhomboid>middle trapezius>lower trapezius. The data further suggest that volleyball players have stronger intrarotation in rotation adducted position than in the rotation abducted position, while extra rotation shows the opposite trend. Finally, our data suggest that force development is greater in the supine position compared to the orthostatic position.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".